From the monthly archives:

June 2009

The Sid & Nancy of artist marketing

by Mark on June 26, 2009

God may have saved the queen, but Amanda and Michael are saving artists from poverty

A Twitter essay on two artists who are hacking the system and redesigning the artist/fan relationship in real time.

When you mention the future of the music, publishing, and film industries, you’re talking about the future of artist marketing.

After all, these industries finance, produce, market, and distribute the work of artists. They only exist BECAUSE of artists.

So, if you remove the cost of marketing and distribution thanks to the internets and the cost of production because of cheap tools…

…what does a label, publisher, or studio offer an artist? More importantly, does the artist need what they’re offering?

The answer to the first part is being worked out. There is definitely a role for a scaled down, networked middleman…

…if not least of which is that some artists WANT to offload the business of marketing and distribution elsewhere.

But for artists who want control of marketing/distribution or simply want to experiment during these times of flux…

…then @amandapalmer and @michaelnobbs could teach us all some interesting tricks.

Experimental and restless, both of them are refashioning the artist/fan relationship in real time.

First, they seem to understand that their value is less WHAT people consume and more HOW they consume.

That’s the magic of shifting from product to process. From monologue to dialogue.

For @amandapalmer, this means relying less on her recorded music as revenue. Now, it’s used increasingly as marketing.

But free music won’t bring people out to concerts. So Palmer also engages with her fans and builds up loyalty.

Flash mobs in cities, constant Twitter parties, invitations to her play…all of these turn “me” & “them” into “us.”

She’s also playing with other (revenue) formats: a book with Neil Gaiman, a play with her high school drama teacher, a tshirt party with her fans.

British artist @michaelnobbs looks & sounds nothing like @amandapalmer. But in his quiet way he’s also mashing the system.

Nobbs published a few books that did well for him. But recently he’s noticed that engagement comes first.

So he released, free of charge, 75 Ways to Draw More which spawned a Flickr group.

On the success of 75 Ways, he’s now released “Start to draw your life.”

His peers thought he was mad to give his work away for free. Certainly Palmer’s peers think she’s a mad hatter.

But Nobbs explains: “people seeing my art is great. People USING it is better.” We think he’s onto something.

People “using” your stuff, people interacting with you…the relationship is the new single.

The relationship is what helps you go platinum since it means you have engagement. That gives you a chance to make money.

Without engagement, you can’t make money. Period. And while we appreciate starving artists in stories—less so in real life.

So hats off to @amandapalmer and @michaelnobbs, the punk rockers of #artistmarketing.

It's a line, silly.

We wrote about Amanda Palmer before.

If you like these Twitter essays/rants, you might like:

Publishers are the new Flickr Groups

We are the media

{ 4 comments }

Hermione gets Vogue’d

by Mark on June 25, 2009

What all the witches are wearing

♫ She ain't no muggle ♫

While Daniel Radcliffe has been busy taking off his clothes for Equus, Emma Watson has been pursuing an opposite approach with Vogue.

While I love the idea of black and white photography, these images seem surprisingly current because of the crispness of the colour. Mentally juxtaposing the time period they were taken in with their full-colour ‘realness’ makes me take a second look (and a third and a fourth).

When I compare these to the black and white images I usually associate with this era, I find it amazing how the medium itself literally ‘colours’ how we see history. These people seem alive, the sky is blue and the colour of their clothing is vibrant. I can identify with and learn from them in ways that I can’t from the dour-looking folk I see in most old black and whites. It makes me wonder how today’s realistic hi-res images (not to mention the rest of the digital context that goes along with the images) will influence people 100 years in the future.

They were taken mostly in Russia by a man called Prokudin-Gorsky from 1909 to about 1915. His technique of taking three different photos using colour filters and then projecting them on top of each other using coloured light gave the results seen above. There are a number of different sites that house his photos, among them this Flickr stream.

Thanks Anorak!

by Kaye on June 20, 2009

Anorak MagsWe just got a special delivery from Anorak in the UK. The kids will love the style of the magazine — look for future pics that are well-thumbed :)

{ 2 comments }

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies

The goldmine that is Pride and Prejudice and Zombies goes hardcover, sporting 13 original illustrations. Good instincts, Quirk Classics.

The shadow of Ueda

by Laszlo on June 10, 2009

The Last Guardian #1

The Last Guardian #2

The Last Guardian. Concept artist Hitoshi Niwa for director Fumito Ueda.

Publishers are the new Flickr groups

by Mark on June 9, 2009

Phyllotaxis_Krazydad_Flickr

A blog post about the increasing liquidity of publishing, atomized into tweets, and recombined back into a blog post. Thus cleverly reinforcing the theme.

For a moment, think about stories as photos. Now, think about Flickr’s photo database. A few billion jpgs.

When you have that many images on a server, obscurity is the default. The “object” is known only to the creator and a handful of people.

Obscurity is the greatest threat to a creator. Forget DRM, copyright, & pirating. For 95% of creators, NOT being seen is their issue.

What @flickr’s @caterina & @stewart got right (and @rokali for @etsy) was discovery: creating enough ways to find, share, & curate objects.

Tags are the foundation, borrowed from @delicious’s @joshu. Tags trump taxonomy w/ folksonomy. Users define how things are organized.

Uniqueness, the attention-algorithm, is the masterstroke. By gumming enough data points, Flickr can surface great shots for most tags.

But the unsung hero of Flickr is the group. There are groups for everything. From circles-in-squares to Japanese street fashion to Obama.

Increasingly, publishers are to stories what Flickr groups are to photos: niche curators celebrating works that inspire them.

When @zenguin noted “curators matter more than ever” http://bit.ly/d06Ki she was essentially outlining the virtues of a Flickr group.

Look at editor @stacylwhitman. Her new press http://bit.ly/15YQWZ is dedicated to multicultural sci-fi for kids and young adults.

Or illustrator Julia Rothman’s new imprint Book By It’s Cover Press http://bit.ly/E0Osn which focuses solely on artist monographs.

Or @katmeyer’s new venture, Quartet Press. Quench is their first imprint (ie. filter). But more filters (ie. imprints) will follow.

As stories break from their shackles, mighty publishing will take on the liquidity of Flickr groups, rapidly assembling and dissolving.

The roles of publicists, agents, editors, and writers will become fluid. An “imprint” will constantly shift in ownership and focus.

Flickr showed us the changes in publishing. But like the future, the changes were unevenly distributed. They’re catching up.

Monster mash

by Mark on June 7, 2009

The King of Cheese

Mr Wetherby

Adam pinged us today with a link to Daniel’s Daily Monster, a growing collection of Post-It-sized b&w monster sketches by Jon Hicks. Not only are the monsters sweet, but so is their reason for being: Hicks produces one-a-day for his son’s lunchbox.

On Friday, Headmine linked us to the world of Mark Brown’s Lost MacGuffin, a beautiful array of richly textured creatures with whom we instantly wanted to play.

Octo-Angel

Teatime with devil

Have an artist crush you want to express?
Ping us
and we’ll take a peek.